NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, PETITIONER,
v.
HECK'S, INC., RESPONDENT
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, PETITIONER,
HECK'S, INC., RESPONDENT
387 F.2d 65
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (1967)
Caution
Cited by 14 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
The evidence adduced before the trial examiner, taken as a whole,1 provides a substantial factual basis to support the Board’s determination that the Company violated sections 8(a) (3) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 158(a) (3) and (1), in the following respects: (a) in its discriminatory discharge of employee Hunt because of her union activities and in order to discourage such activities by other employees; and (b) in unilaterally increasing wages and decreasing hours in order to influence and coerce employees in their choice of a representative during the union organizing campaign.
Accordingly, enforcement of the Board’s order is granted.
Enforcement granted.
. Universal Camera Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 340 U.S. 474, 71 S.Ct. 456, 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
J. P. Stevens & Co., Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 406 F.2d 1017 (4th Cir. 1968)
-
Hughes & Hatcher v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 393 F.2d 557 (6th Cir. 1968)
-
Food Store Emps. Union v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 476 F.2d 546 (D.C. Cir. 1973)
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 340 U.S. 474 (U.S. 1951)