BERGMANN & BIAGIOTTI, INC., D/B/A THE COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, APPELLANT,
v.
TIC GROUP, LTD., APPELLEE
BERGMANN & BIAGIOTTI, INC., D/B/A THE COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, APPELLANT,
TIC GROUP, LTD., APPELLEE
440 So. 2d 457
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1983)
Caution
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Reversed. We believe the trial court erred in entering summary judgment on the appellant’s claim for breach of a written agreement and in denying appellant’s motion to amend. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Thompson Aircraft Tire Corp., 353 So. 2d 137 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Haag v. Phillips, 333 So. 2d 507 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976). We also reverse the order awarding attorney’s fees.
ANSTEAD, C.J., and BERANEK and DELL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Thomas v. State, 28 So. 3d 240 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)…s and is not confined to a defense raised by the defendant. Miller, 729 So. 2d at 419. Id.See also id. (citing State v. Ayala, 713 So. 2d 1050, 1052 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); (Wilson v. State, 13 So. 3d 83, 84 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009)); Featherstone v. State, 440 So. 2d 457 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) (utilizing analysis in violation of probation case). “As a general rule, an informant’s identity need not be disclosed when the informant’s sole role is to provide probable cause in support of a search warrant.” State v. Burgos,…
-
State v. Natson, 661 So. 2d 926 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)…d district, without discussion, equated the anonymous tipster with a confidential informant and found no error in the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s motion to disclose the tipster’s identity. Respondent’s reliance on Featherstone v. State, 440 So. 2d 457 (Fla.'4th DCA 1983) for his position that anonymous tipsters are not [*928] confidential informers within the scope of the privilege is misplaced. In Feather stone, this court held that the state’s mere assertion that certain witnesses requested to…
Authorities Cited
- The Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Thompson Aircraft Tire Corp., 353 So. 2d 137 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)
- Haag v. Phillips, 333 So. 2d 507 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976)