ELOF MALM, APPELLEE,
v.
UNITED STATES LINES COMPANY, APPELLANT
ELOF MALM, APPELLEE,
UNITED STATES LINES COMPANY, APPELLANT
378 F.2d 941
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (1967)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 14 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
We affirm on the basis of Judge Weinfeld’s opinion in the District Court, reported at 269 F.Supp. 731 (S.D.N.Y. 1967).1
. Since neither party on appeal raised the issue of maintenance and cure, we have not considered that portion of Judge Weinfeld’s opinion.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Morton Globus v. LAW Research Serv., Inc., 418 F.2d 1276 (2d Cir. 1969)
-
Solomon Lusby v. T.G. & Y. Stores, Inc., 749 F.2d 1423 (10th Cir. 1984)
-
Merchant v. Ruhle, 740 F.2d 86 (1st Cir. 1984)
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence