UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE,
v.
AL HARRIS, APPELLANT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that a sentence exceeding six months for criminal contempt requires a jury trial or waiver thereof, and the district court exceeded its power by imposing a one-year sentence without a jury.
Harris was found guilty of criminal contempt for refusing to answer grand jury questions after being granted immunity. He was sentenced to one year in…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Criminal Contempt cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Once more A1 Harris has been found guilty by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for refusing to answer the questions propounded on July 31, 1963 before a grand jury and again on August 1, 1963 before Judge McLean, following a grant of immunity pursuant to the Federal Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 409 (£)•
Harris was convicted of contempt by Judge McLean pursuant to Rule 42(a), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and this court affirmed his conviction, 334 F. 2d 460 (2 Cir. 1964). The Supreme Court reversed, 382 U.S. 162, 86 S.Ct. 352, 15 L.Ed.2d 240 (1965), and on remand Harris was tried before Judge Murphy, without a jury, in accordance with Rule 42(b), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and again found guilty. On May 16, 1966, he was sentenced to a year in jail.
Subsequent to Judge Murphy’s sentencing of Harris, the Supreme Court in Cheff v. Sehnackenberg, 384 U.S. 373, 380, 86 S.Ct. 1523, 1526, 16 L.Ed.2d 629 (1966), announced the rule that “sentences exceeding six months for criminal contempt may not be imposed by federal courts absent a jury trial or waiver thereof.”
Accordingly, as all parties concede, the district court exceeded its power in sentencing Harris to more than six months, as the finding of guilt was not made by a jury.
As we find no other error in the proceedings and no merit in any other contentions raised on this appeal, we reduce the sentence imposed by the district court from one year to six months, in the exercise of the “peculiar power of the federal courts to revise sentences in contempt cases,” Cheff v. Schnackenberg, supra at 380, 86 S.Ct. at 1526; see Green v. United States, 356 U.S. 165, 188, 78 S. Ct. 632, 2 L.Ed.2d 672 (1958); United States v. Levine, 288 F. 2d 272 (2 Cir. 1961), and we affirm the judgment.
The order of the district court is modified to provide that the sentence is for imprisonment of six months.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Ferrara, 377 F.2d 16 (2d Cir. 1967)
-
Lathrop Douglass v. First Nat'l Realty Corp. Appeal of Sidney S. Brown, 543 F.2d 894 (D.C. Cir. 1976)
-
United States v. Johnson, 414 F.2d 22 (6th Cir. 1969)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Green v. United States, 356 U.S. 165 (U.S. 1958)
- Cheff v. Schnackenberg, 384 U.S. 373 (U.S. 1966)
- Harris v. United States, 382 U.S. 162 (U.S. 1965)
- United States v. Al Harris, 334 F.2d 460 (2d Cir. 1964)
- United States v. Morry Levine, 288 F.2d 272 (2d Cir. 1961)