APPLICATION OF PREFORMED LINE PRODUCTS COMPANY

C.C.P.A. | 1966-05-12
No. Patent Appeal No. 7540
359 F.2d 907 United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals (1966)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the slogan, when viewed in its entirety, is not merely descriptive and is capable of identifying and distinguishing the applicant's goods.


Facts & Procedural History

Preformed Line Products Co. sought to register a trademark used on pole line hardware. The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board denied registration, findi…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
WORLEY, Chief Judge.

WORLEY, Chief Judge.

This appeal is from the decision1 of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board refusing registration on the Principal Register of the trademark

which Preformed Line Products Co. alleges has been used on goods known in the electrical trade as pole line hardware

since July 25, 1961.

In denying registration, the board said:

* * * the subject mark of the application is “dominated” by the term “PREFORMED”, which has heretofore been held to be merely descriptive and hence incapable of identifying applicant’s goods and distinguishing them from like goods of others.3

Although we agreed with the board’s ruling in the first “Preformed” appeal, we are unable to agree that it is controlling here in view of different facts. There “Preformed” stood alone; here, however, it has become a part of the slogan “You can look up to Preformed.” We do not think incorporating “Preformed” into the instant slogan, granted its prominence, makes the entire slogan “merely descriptive.” In our view the slogan, viewed in its entirety, as it must be, performs its intended function of identifying appellant’s goods and distinguishing them from those of others.

Reversed.

. 142 USPQ 517.

. Appellant’s application Serial No. 131,-992, filed November 14, 1961, describes the goods as

Accessories for Electrical Ropes,, Cables, Strands, Wires, and Pole Line Hardware, Armor Rods and Wires, Splices, Line Guards, Patch Rods, Tap Armor, Line Splices, Dead Ends, Telephone Splints, Splint and Tie Assemblies, Lashing Rods, Conductor Suspension Systems, Electrical Splice Shunts, Spacers for Parallel Conductors, Tangent Supports, Drop Wire Hangers

which are used in conjunction with overhead electrical transmission lines.

. The board was referring to this court’s decision in In re Preformed Line Products Co., 323 F. 2d 1007, 51 CCPA 775, where we found the word “Preformed” to be “merely descriptive” when applied to the identical goods recited here.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw