UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
MATTHEW J. SIANO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

2d Cir. | 1966-02-28
Nos. 251, Docket 30013
356 F.2d 927 United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (1966) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

Embezzled money constitutes taxable income to the embezzler, even for periods before the Supreme Court's decision in James v. United States.


Facts & Procedural History

Appellant pleaded guilty to embezzling over $160,000. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue assessed income taxes for these embezzled funds. The govern…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM:

We affirm in open court the decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York which held appellant liable for $107,963.92 in income taxes for the years 1953-1956 inclusive.

In 1957, Siano pleaded guilty to having embezzled over $160,000 during the years 1949 through 1956. He was sentenced to a term of seven and one-half to fifteen years in prison. Siano never reported the money received from his embezzlement as income and on August 25, 1961 the Commissioner of Internal Revenue made assessments against Siano for income taxes due, which assessments form the basis of this suit. The government originally sought to collect $176,329.70 in unpaid income taxes. Thereafter, however, it amended its complaint by striking assessments for the years 1949-1952, inclusive, which are barred by the statute of limitations, and by striking fraud penalties for the years 1953-1956, inclusive.

In James v. United States, 366 U. S. 213, 81 S.Ct. 1052, 6 L.Ed.2d 246 (1961), the Supreme Court expressly overruled its prior decision in Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Wilcox, 327 U.S. 404, 66 S.Ct. 546, 90 L.Ed. 752 (1946) and held that embezzled money constitutes taxable income to the embezzler. Siano argues that because the Supreme Court held in James that there coüld be no conviction for the crime of wilfully attempting to evade income taxes (26 U.S.C. § 7201) during the period prior to the James decision since wilfulness could not be proven as long as Wilcox was law, 366 U.S. at 221, 222, 81 S.Ct. 1052, the Commissioner can assert no deficiencies in income tax against those who failed to report the receipt of embezzled monies as income during the period prior to James.

We agree with the view taken by other circuits that money which was embezzled prior to the James decision constitutes taxable income to the embezzler. Estate of Geiger v. Commissioner of Internal Rev., 352 F. 2d 221 (8 Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 86 S.Ct. 620, January 25, 1966; Estate of Adame v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 320 F. 2d 811, 814 (5 Cir. 1963); Donohue v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 323 F. 2d 651, 652 (7 Cir. 1963) (dictum), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 911, 84 S.Ct. 667, 11 L.Ed.2d 609 (1964); United States v. Goldberg, 330 F. 2d 30, 39 (3 Cir. 1964) (dictum), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 953, 84 S.Ct. 1630, 12 L.Ed.2d 497 (1964).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw