UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
STANLEY HUBERMAN, APPELLANT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
STANLEY HUBERMAN, APPELLANT
356 F.2d 515
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (1966)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We think that appellant’s filing of his notice of appeal was timely under the facts before us. O’Neal v. United States, 272 F. 2d 412 (5 Cir. 1943).
Regarding the merits, we find that there is no error of substance in the trial record.
The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Berry v. United States, 412 F.2d 189 (3d Cir. 1969)
-
Woodward v. United States, 426 F.2d 959 (3d Cir. 1970)
-
United States v. del Piano, 386 F.2d 436 (3d Cir. 1967)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Print Carter O'Neal v. United States, 272 F.2d 412 (5th Cir. 1959)