ABDULLAH AHMAD BEY ET AL.
v.
FRANCIS MULDOON, ALFRED CORRY AND STEWART SOBELMAN, TRUSTEES AND ROBERT KELLY, ADMINISTRATOR OF A SPECIAL FUND (2/5/62), ET AL. ABDULLAH AHMAD BEY, APPELLANT

3d Cir. | 1966-01-27
No. 15133
354 F.2d 1005 United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (1966) Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Much of the previous history of this case is set out in 217 F.Supp. 401 (E.D.Pa.1962), id., 404 (E.D.Pa.1963) and 223 F.Supp. 489 (E.D.Pa.1963), and need not be repeated here. The agreement was reformed in accordance with the opinion last cited and as required by it. See id. supra, 496. An examination of the record and of the briefs and consideration of the oral arguments lead us to the conclusion that the court below committed no error. Consequently, the order of the court below requiring judgment to be entered for the defendants and dissolving the injunction restraining the transfer of money from the royalty fund will be affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw