THOMAS RACHEL ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
STATE OF GEORGIA, APPELLEE

5th Cir. | 1965-04-19
No. 21354
343 F.2d 909 Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1965) Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM:

It is ordered that the petition for rehearing filed in the above styled and numbered cause be, and the same is, hereby denied.
Other
BELL, Circuit Judge

BELL, Circuit Judge

(concurring in part and dissenting in part):

I would grant the petition for rehearing to the extent noted in my dissent to the original opinion and for that purpose I dissent from the denial of the petition for rehearing; otherwise I concur.
Dissent
WHITEHURST, District Judge PER CURIAM:

WHITEHURST, District Judge

(dissenting) :

I would grant the petition for rehearing for the reason that the Appellate Court has no jurisdiction by virtue of Rule 37(a) (2) of the F.R.Crim.P. PER CURIAM:
It appearing that each of the members of the Court adheres to his views originally expressed in the several opinions heretofore filed, the petition for rehearing is denied.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw