REV. FRANCIS JOHN CONTI AND THE FREEDOM CHURCH OF REVELATION, APPELLANTS,
v.
INTERNATIONAL PRECIOUS METALS CORPORATION, APPELLEE; REV. LINDA JANE CONTI, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEE OF THE OCEAN RIDGE CONGREGATION OF THE FREEDOM CHURCH OF REVELATION, APPELLANT, V. INTERNATIONAL PRECIOUS METALS CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1983-08-17
Nos. 82-625, 82-1661
ANSTEAD, C.J., and BERANEK and HURLEY, JJ., concur.
436 So. 2d 367 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1983) Caution
Cited by 7 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We have considered each of the issues raised by appellant in these consolidated appeals and have concluded that reversible error has not been demonstrated in either appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the orders of the trial court. ,

ANSTEAD, C.J., and BERANEK and HURLEY, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Smith v. Moughan, 442 So. 2d 338 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983)
    …supported by the child for the balance of their lives. . Harvey v. Harvey, 411 So. 2d 324 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982); Lambert v. Lambert, 403 So. 2d 484 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Caldwell v. Caldwell, 400 So. 2d 1270 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). But see Cain v. Cain, 436 So. 2d 367 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Farkas v. Farkas, 426 So. 2d 1213 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). . Anderson; Harvey. . Cannon v. Morris, 407 So. 2d 372 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). But see Farkas (In Farkas, however, the exclusive possession right upheld, unlike this case, wa…
  • MTGLQ Invs. v. Moore, 293 So. 3d 610 (Fla. 1st DCA 2020)
    …easonable men. Unscrupulous practices, overreaching, concealment, trickery or other unconscient[i]ous conduct are sufficient to bar relief.” Id. (quoting 22 Fla. Jur. 2d Equity § 50). Relying on the partial dissent of Judge Walden in Cain v. Cain, 436 So. 2d 367, 369 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983), the court in Hitt v. Hitt, 535 So. 2d 631, 634 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988), observed that “[d]enying access to the [c]ourt based on the doctrine of unclean hands is an extreme sanction which ought to be invoked under only the most…
  • Hitt v. Hitt, 535 So. 2d 631 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988)
    …lving their marriage. Would that it could realistically be done [*634] more often that way. Thus, we conclude that resort to the doctrine of unclean hands was not indicated in this case. As Judge Walden opined in his partial dissent in Cain v. Cain, 436 So. 2d 367, 369 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983): Denying access to the Court based on the doctrine of unclean hands is an extreme sanction which ought to be invoked under only the most provocative or contumacious circumstances. It is tantamount to striking a party’s plea…

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw