UNITED PACKINGHOUSE, FOOD AND ALLIED WORKERS, AFL-CIO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
WILSON & CO., INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLEE

7th Cir. | 1965-01-18
No. 14467
340 F.2d 958 United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit (1965)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The Supreme Court's affirmance of a similar case by an equally divided court is determinative of the issue in this case.


Facts & Procedural History

Plaintiff union sued defendant employer to compel arbitration of a grievance concerning contracted out work. The issue was substantially the same as i…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff United Packinghouse, Food and Allied Workers, AFL-CIO brought suit to compel defendant Wilson & Co., Inc. to arbitrate a grievance concerning contracted out work which plaintiff contended belonged to its bargaining unit at defendant’s plant at Albert Lea, Minnesota.

Both parties concede that the issue here is substantially the same as that decided by this court in Independent Petroleum Workers of America, Inc. v. American Oil Co., 324 F. 2d 903 (7th Cir. 1963), cert. granted, 377 U.S. 930, 84 S.Ct. 1336, 12 L.Ed.2d 294 (May 18, 1964). Following oral argument on June 3, 1964, we ordered that further action “be withheld until the Supreme Court has acted on the Independent Petroleum Workers’ case.”

The Supreme Court on certiorari to this court in Independent Petroleum Workers of America, Inc. v. American Oil Co., on November 23, 1964, 85 S.Ct. 271, affirmed this court’s judgment by an equally divided Court. Because of the similarity of issues, the Supreme Court decision in Independent Petroleum Workers is determinative of the issue presented in the instant case. On that basis the district court’s judgment of dismissal is affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw