H. T. MAHONEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEFENDENT-APPELLEE; RUBY THELMA LOFTIS PIERCE, ETC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
H. T. MAHONEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEFENDENT-APPELLEE; RUBY THELMA LOFTIS PIERCE, ETC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
339 F.2d 605
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit (1964)
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
These appeals came on to be heard and v?ere submitted to the Court on oral arguments, briefs and records.
The issues raised are largely factual in nature and received careful consideration in the District Court. We think there was substantial evidence to support the findings of fact of the District Judge and they are not eleai’ly erroneous.
The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed for the reasons and upon the ground set forth in the excellent opinion of Chief Judge Robert L. Taylor, reported in 220 F.Supp. 823,.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Delora Huff Page, 350 F.2d 28 (10th Cir. 1965)
-
Gowdy v. United States, 412 F.2d 525 (6th Cir. 1969)
-
Yates v. United States, 365 F.2d 663 (4th Cir. 1966)
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence