NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, PETITIONER,
v.
DANIELS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY OF VIRGINIA, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court denied the Board's request for enforcement of its order.
The Board sought enforcement of an order finding the Respondent violated the NLRA by discharging employees for protected concerted activity. The Exami…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse National Labor Relations Act Section 8(A)(1) Violations cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM:
The Board seeks enforcement of its order based upon a finding by the Examiner 1 that the Respondent violated Section 8(a) (1) 2 of the National Labor Relations Act by discharging two of its employees for having sponsored the election of a particular person as shop foreman, a concerted activity protected by Section 73 of the Act. Our duty to examine the record as a whole to determine whether there is substantial evidence to support the Board's findings was made impossible by the Examiner’s ignoring without explanation or analysis and seemingly without consideration the evidence offered by the Respondent. No anti-union bias was found, and the Respondent’s offer of a coherent and logical explanation for its conduct deserves a less cavalier treatment.
Denied.
. The Board adopted the Examiner’s findings, conclusions and recommendations.
. 49 Stat. 452 (1935), as amended, 61 Stat. 140, 29 U.S.C.A. § 158(a) (1) (1947).
. 49 Stat. 452 (1935), as amended, 61 Stat. 140, 29 U.S.C.A. § 157 (1947).