LENA E. WHITLEY, APPELLANT,
v.
TEXAS & PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the jury instructions were sufficiently specific and the admission of evidence regarding past accidents was not erroneous.
A jury rendered a verdict in favor of the defendant railway company in a FELA case. The plaintiff appealed, alleging errors in jury instructions and t…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Fela Claim cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
In this FELA ease the jury rendered a verdict in favor of the defendant railway company. The plaintiff’s appeal rests on the district court’s alleged error (1) in failing to give instructions specifically embodying the plaintiff’s theory of recovery and (2) in allowing evidence showing that there had been no accidents in the past where the accident had occurred.
We have considered carefully the trial judge’s instructions to the jury. We find that the instructions are sufficiently specific to charge the jury correctly as to the plaintiff’s theory of the case. This is all the law requires.
There was no error in the admission of the evidence. See Rule 43(a), Fed.Rules Civ.Proc.; Givens v. DeSoto Building Company, et al., 156 La. 377, 100 So. 534; Sistrunk v. Audubon Park Natatorium, La.App., 164 So. 667; Savoy v. G. F. Poole Mortuary, Inc., et al., La.App., 60 So. 2d 108; Greeves v. S. H. Kress & Company, La.App., 198 So. 171; Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Company v. Lint, 8 Cir. 1954, 217 F. 2d 279; Hambrice v. F. W. Woolworth Company, 5 Cir. 1961, 290 F. 2d 557; Bonner v. Mercantile National Bank of Dallas, Tex.Civ.App., 203 S.W. 2d 780.
The judgment is affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Hambrice v. F. W. Woolworth Co., 290 F.2d 557 (5th Cir. 1961)
- Chicago v. Lint, 217 F.2d 279 (8th Cir. 1954)