HOLLIS FRAZIER HUTCHINS, APPELLANT,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE
HOLLIS FRAZIER HUTCHINS, APPELLANT,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE
322 F.2d 649
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit (1963)
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from a denial of a motion made under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 for relief from a sentence imposed after jury trial for violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2312. The only point deserving consideration relates to the admission of a statement made while in state custody. The trial court found, and the record confirms, that the statement was entirely of an exculpatory nature consistent with the defense presented by the movant. Without consideration of whether the point may be raised on a collateral attack, we are convinced that Mallory v. United States, 354 U.S. 449, 77 S.Ct. 1356, 1 L.Ed.2d 1479, has no application because the statement was in explanation of movant's, conduct rather than a statement against interest.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cleveland Roy Williams v. United States, 323 F.2d 672 (10th Cir. 1963)
-
Barkan v. The United States, 341 F.2d 95 (10th Cir. 1965)
-
FOX v. Taylor, 344 F.2d 753 (10th Cir. 1965)
Authorities Cited
- Mallory v. United States, 354 U.S. 449 (U.S. 1957)