JOCYLIN E. KIMBLER
v.
THE PITTSBURGH & LAKE ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY, APPELLANT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that a judgment cannot be reviewed without adequate findings of fact and conclusions of law from the trial court.
Plaintiff, a railroad employee, sued the defendant railroad under FELA for a negligent injury after slipping on icy steps. The principal dispute conce…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Negligent Injury cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This FELA action by a railroad employee for negligent injury was tried to the court without a jury and resulted in the recovery of a money judgment. The defendant railroad appealed.
When the appeal was originally called for argument, this court directed attention to the absence of findings of fact and conclusions of law and ordered the case continued to permit the transcription of missing parts of the record which counsel thought would remedy this deficiency. However, it now appears that even with this additional material, including certain observations of the trial judge from the bench, we are unable to reach the merits of the case.
The evidence indicates that the plaintiff slipped and fell on icy steps. The principal question in dispute was whether the railroad failed to furnish some advance protection or to take some corrective action such as a reasonable person in its position would have done to prevent such a mishap. Until we know what significant facts, in the trial court’s view, were established by the evidence, and upon what facts and factual inferences the court based its conclusion that the defendant had not exercised due care, we cannot satisfactorily review the merits of the decision.
The judgment will be vacated and the cause remanded for the making of informative and dispositive findings of fact and conclusions of law.