ROBERT EUGENE BYRD, APPELLANT,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the jury's verdict of guilty for possession of unregistered distilling apparatus and non-tax paid distilled spirits.
Firefighters responding to a fire discovered a whiskey still, mash, and untaxed whiskey in a house. The appellant had rented the house under an assume…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Constructive Possession cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This appeal is from a conviction on those eoxxnts of axx indictment charging possession of unregistered distilling apparatus in violation of 26 U.S.C.A. § 5601(a) (1), and possession of non tax paid distilled spirits in violation of 26 U.S.C.A. §§ 5205(a) (2) and 5604(a) d).
The evidence disclosed that the Atlanta Fire Department was called to extinguish a fire in a house in that city. The firemen found, upon arx'ival, a whiskey still set up in the basement together with a quantity of sugar, bran, and half gallon fruit jars. Forty seven gallons of whiskey in jars containing no tax stamps were foxxnd at the still. Six vats coxxtaining a total of four thousand and fifty gallons of mash were found in the two bedrooms on the main floor. There was testimony by a revenue agent that the still appeared to have beexx in operation within a few hours of the fire.
No one was found at the house. Appellant rented the house on October 14, 1961 under an assumed name, some five months before the fire on March 20, 1962. He paid the rent monthly, making the last payment in person to the owner on March 13, 1962, seven days before the fire. Four letters addressed to him, and bearing recent dates, were found in the house. One of his fingerprints was found on a wine bottle taken from a refrigerator in the house.
This evidence, furnishing as it does a basis for a finding of constructive possession in appellant, was sufficient to support the jury verdict of guilty. See Teate v. United States, 5 Cir., 1962, 297 F. 2d 120; Chastain v. United States, 5 Cir., 1956, 237 F. 2d 422; Lovette v. United States, 5 Cir., 1956, 230 F. 2d 263; Ramsey v. United States, 6 Cir., 1957, 248 F. 2d 740; Chadwell v. United States, 6 Cir., 1958, 260 F. 2d 257; and Mills v. United States, 4 Cir., 1952,. 194 F. 2d 184.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Teate v. United States, 297 F.2d 120 (5th Cir. 1961)
- Henritta Lovette v. United States, 230 F.2d 263 (5th Cir. 1956)
- Sanford Ramsey v. United States, 248 F.2d 740 (6th Cir. 1957)
- Chastain v. United States, 237 F.2d 422 (5th Cir. 1956)
- Mills v. United States, 194 F.2d 184 (4th Cir. 1952)
- Chadwell v. United States, 260 F.2d 257 (6th Cir. 1958)