UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE,
v.
ALBERT GROSSMAN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

2d Cir. | 1963-03-19
Nos. 286, Docket 27957
315 F.2d 94 United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (1963) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm in open court the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Me-Gohey, J. After a trial without a jury, the defendant was found guilty of engaging in wagering transactions without paying the special tax imposed by 26 U.S. C. § 4411 and of failing to register as required by 26 U.S.C. § 4412, and was sentenced to pay a fine totalling $2,000 and a penalty of $50. 26 U.S.C. §§ 7262, 7203, 7272. The defendant’s contentions of error at trial are without merit.

By order dated October 1, 1962, Judge McGohey denied the defendant’s motion for the return of money seized by Internal Revenue Service agents at the time of his arrest. The money having been seized and being subject to forfeiture under 26 U.S.C. § 7302, and having been administratively forfeited as prescribed by 26 U.S.C. § 7325, the motion for the return of the money was properly denied. 26 U.S.C. § 7327, 19 U.S.C. § 1618. See United States v. Heckinger, 163 F. 2d 472 (2 Cir., 1947); United States v. One Pontiac Coupe, 298 F. 2d 421 (7 Cir., 1962).

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw