STATE SECURITIES COMPANY, A CORPORATION ORGANIZED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEBRASKA, APPELLANT,
v.
FEDERATED MUTUAL IMPLEMENT AND HARDWARE INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION ORGANIZED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, AND ADMITTED TO DO BUSINESS IN THE STATE OF NEBRASKA, APPELLEE
STATE SECURITIES COMPANY, A CORPORATION ORGANIZED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEBRASKA, APPELLANT,
FEDERATED MUTUAL IMPLEMENT AND HARDWARE INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION ORGANIZED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, AND ADMITTED TO DO BUSINESS IN THE STATE OF NEBRASKA, APPELLEE
308 F.2d 452
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit (1962)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the judgment for the defendant (appellee) in this diversity case governed by Nebraska law and tried to Judge John W. Delehant without a jury. He has written an exhaustive opinion, reported in D.C., 204 F.Supp. 207, to which we can add nothing. That opinion and the briefs of the parties have convinced us that the judgment appealed from represents, at the very least, a permissible conclusion with respect to a doubtful question of Nebraska law, which this Court will not reverse. Homolla v. Gluck, 8 Cir., 248 F. 2d 731, 733; Weiby v. Farmers Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 8 Cir., 273 F. 2d 327, 331; Village of Brooten v. Cudahy Packing Company, 8 Cir., 291 F. 2d 284, 301.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States ex rel. Westinghouse Elec. v. James Stewart Co., 336 F.2d 777 (9th Cir. 1964)
-
United States v. Myers, 331 F.2d 591 (8th Cir. 1964)
Authorities Cited
- Homolla v. Gluck, 248 F.2d 731 (8th Cir. 1957)
- Vill. OF Brooten v. Cudahy Packing Co., 291 F.2d 284 (8th Cir. 1961)
- Weiby v. Farmers Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 273 F.2d 327 (8th Cir. 1960)