ZARRY DERAL DIXON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ZARRY DERAL DIXON, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
432 So. 2d 779
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1983)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
MILLS, Judge.
Dixon appeals the denial of his Rule 3.850 motion for postconviction relief. We affirm.
Dixon argues that since only his co-felon carried a rifle, he should not have been convicted of armed robbery. Vicarious possession is sufficient to sustain the conviction, Hillman v. State, 410 So. 2d 180 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). He further argues that he should not have received a three-year mandatory minimum. The record is clear that he did not.
AFFIRMED.
BOOTH and SHIVERS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Enid Williams v. State, 479 So. 2d 227 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)…rm, Williams’s conviction of robbery with a firearm should be reversed, Jenkins v. State, 448 So. 2d 1060 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984), modified on other grounds, 446 So. 2d 1068 (Fla.1985); Hough v. State, 448 So. 2d 628 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984); Dixon v. State, 432 So. 2d 779 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983), we affirm. Furthermore, we reject Williams’s assertion that the evidence was insufficient to support the jury’s verdict. The victim testified that Williams’s accomplice pointed a gun at him; it was the jury’s function to assess…
Authorities Cited
- Hillman v. State, 410 So. 2d 180 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982)