PRISCILLA ALDEN BEACH, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

ONEIDA NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST COMPANY OF CENTRAL NEW YORK (SUCCESSOR TO ROME TRUST COMPANY) AND JOHNSON D. MCMAHON, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES

2d Cir. | 1962-06-11

Nos. 381, Docket 27548

Before FRIENDLY, KAUFMAN and HAYS, Circuit Judges.

305 F.2d 826 United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (1962) Positive Treatment

Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment in open court. The claim with respect to ownership of the stock was properly dismissed for reasons well stated in Judge Brennan’s memorandum-decision of December 18, 1961, 206 F.Supp. 508. Plaintiff failed to adduce evidence sufficient to warrant submission to the jury of her claim for breach of trust, fraud, and conspiracy in the administration of the trust.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

Pounds v. Pounds, 703 So. 2d 487 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw

PRISCILLA ALDEN BEACH, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. ONEIDA NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST COMPANY OF CENTRAL NEW YORK (SUCCESSOR TO ROME TRUST COMPANY) AND JOHNSON D. MCMAHON, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES

PER CURIAM.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

PRISCILLA ALDEN BEACH, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

ONEIDA NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST COMPANY OF CENTRAL NEW YORK (SUCCESSOR TO ROME TRUST COMPANY) AND JOHNSON D. MCMAHON, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES