UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE,
v.
PETER PESANO, APPELLANT
PER CURIAM.
Appellant was convicted in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York after a jury trial and was sentenced to serve four concurrent terms of two years each. Upon appeal the conviction was affirmed, United States v. Pesano, 293 F. 2d 229 (2 Cir., 1961).
Appellant moved in the district court for a correction of the two year sentence, alleging that the judge who presided at the trial and who sentenced him one week later had indicated after verdict at the conclusion of the trial that the sentence to be later imposed would be four concurrent terms of eighteen months each. The motion was denied and appellant appeals. The sentence, imposed one week after verdict and after allocution, was a permissible sentence. The motion brought pursuant to Rule 35, Fed.R.Crim.Proc., 18 U.S.C. and 28 U.S. C. § 2255 was properly denied below, and that denial is affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Booth v. Peavey Co. Commodity Servs., 430 F.2d 132 (8th Cir. 1970)
-
Hladyshewski v. Robinson, 557 F.2d 1251 (8th Cir. 1977)
-
Jeanes v. Milner, 428 F.2d 598 (8th Cir. 1970)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- United States v. Pesano, 293 F.2d 229 (2d Cir. 1961)