BUDGET DRESS CORP., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
JOINT BOARD OF DRESS AND WAISTMAKERS' UNION OF GREATER NEW YORK AND ITS CONSTITUENT LOCALS, AND CHARLES S. ZIMMERMAN, NATHANIEL M. MINKOFF AND LEON NAMENWIRTH, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS GENERAL MANAGER, SECRETARY-TREASURER AND PRESIDENT, RESPECTIVELY, OF THE JOINT BOARD OF DRESS AND WAISTMAKERS' UNION OF GREATER NEW YORK; THE INTERNATIONAL LADIES' GARMENT WORKERS' UNION, AFL-CIO; AND THE POPULAR PRICED DRESS MANUFACTURERS' GROUP, INC., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
BUDGET DRESS CORP., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
JOINT BOARD OF DRESS AND WAISTMAKERS' UNION OF GREATER NEW YORK AND ITS CONSTITUENT LOCALS, AND CHARLES S. ZIMMERMAN, NATHANIEL M. MINKOFF AND LEON NAMENWIRTH, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS GENERAL MANAGER, SECRETARY-TREASURER AND PRESIDENT, RESPECTIVELY, OF THE JOINT BOARD OF DRESS AND WAISTMAKERS' UNION OF GREATER NEW YORK; THE INTERNATIONAL LADIES' GARMENT WORKERS' UNION, AFL-CIO; AND THE POPULAR PRICED DRESS MANUFACTURERS' GROUP, INC., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
299 F.2d 936
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (1962)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
[*937] PER CURIAM.
Appellant seeks to recover monies paid into certain health, welfare and retirement funds on the grounds the payments violated section 302 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 186. On the basis of Minkoff v. Scranton Frocks, Inc., D.C., 181 F.Supp. 542, aff’d per curiam 279 F. 2d 115 (2 Cir. 1960) and the opinion of Chief Judge Ryan in the present case insofar as it deals with the merits of appellant’s claim under Section 302, we affirm, 198 F.Supp. 4.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Walsh v. Schlecht, 429 U.S. 401 (U.S. 1977)
-
Conn. Gen. Life Ins. Co. & United Aircraft Corp. v. Craton, 405 F.2d 41 (5th Cir. 1968)
-
Est. of Sol Schildkraut v. Commissioner OF Internal Revenue, 368 F.2d 40 (2d Cir. 1966)
Authorities Cited
- Minkoff v. Scranton Frocks, Inc., 279 F.2d 115 (2d Cir. 1960)