CHARLES R. LEAF, PETITIONER,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that corporate funds diverted by a corporate officer to his own use, while the corporation was insolvent, constitute taxable income to the officer.
Petitioner, an officer of a wholly owned corporation, transferred corporate funds to himself in 1952 when the corporation was insolvent. He was later …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse James V. United States cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
In this review of the decision of the Tax Court, the petitioner, Charles R. Leaf, appeared in propria persona at the hearing of the case and filed his own brief and appendix. He seeks to reverse the decision of the Tax Court, which affirmed the Commissioner of Internal Revenue in determining deficiencies in petitioner’s income taxes for the years 1950, 1951 and 1952. The deficiency was especially large in the last-mentioned year. Briefly analyzed, the stipulated facts were that the petitioner caused funds of his wholly owned corporation to be transferred to him in 1952, at which time the corporation was insolvent and shortly thereafter was adjudicated a bankrupt. He either deposited the transferred funds in his personal bank account, or used the funds to purchase Cashier’s Checks payable to himself. During 1952, he returned a part of the diverted funds to the corporation, or to its creditors.
In 1956, he was convicted on guilty plea in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois for having knowingly and fraudulently transferred to his own use and benefit, while he was an officer of the corporation, property of the corporation in contemplation of bankruptcy, in violation of Title 18, section 152, United States Code. He was sentenced to a term of twenty-five months’ imprisonment.
The Tax Court held that the corporate funds diverted by the petitioner to his own use in 1952 and not returned to the corporation, or its creditors, in that year constituted taxable income. This decision was in conformity with Rutkin v. United States, 343 U.S. 130, 137, 72 S.Ct. 571, 96 L.Ed. 833; Davis v. United States, 6 Cir., 226 F. 2d 331, 334, certiorari denied 350 U.S. 965, 76 S.Ct. 432, 100 L.Ed. 838; James v. United States, 366 U.S. 213, 81 S.Ct. 1052, 6 L.Ed.2d 246.
The decision of the United States Tax Court is affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Critzer, 498 F.2d 1160 (4th Cir. 1974)
-
Est. of Wallace P. Geiger v. Commissioner OF Internal Revenue, 352 F.2d 221 (8th Cir. 1965)
-
Hagaman v. Commissioner OF Internal Revenue, 958 F.2d 684 (6th Cir. 1992)
Authorities Cited
- James v. United States, 366 U.S. 213 (U.S. 1961)
- Rutkin v. United States, 343 U.S. 130 (U.S. 1952)
- Poncet Davis v. United States, 226 F.2d 331 (6th Cir. 1955)
- Reed v. Pa. R.R. Co., 350 U.S. 965 (U.S. 1956)
- Canton v. United States, 350 U.S. 965 (U.S. 1956)