ATLAS BROADCASTING COMPANY, APPELLANT,
v.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, APPELLEE

D.C. Cir. | 1961-10-06
No. 16252
Before Fahy, Bastían and Burger, Circuit Judges.
295 F.2d 183 United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (1961)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the FCC's denial of the station's application to increase operating power was within its discretion and not unreasonable.


Facts & Procedural History

The FCC denied WMAX's application to increase power due to potential interference with station WIOS. The Commission found WMAX failed to demonstrate a…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is from a decision and order of the Federal Communications Commission denying the application of standard broadcast station WMAX, Grand Rapids, Michigan,1 for authority to increase its operating power from 1 kilowatt to 5 kilowatts. The order denying rehearing is also included in the appeal.

There is no contention the issues designated for hearing on the application were not adequate, or that the hearing and resulting findings of the Hearing Examiner, adopted by the Commission in its decision and order, were not factually supported by the evidence, or that any procedural defects afflict the hearing or other proceedings leading to the decision and order. The complaint is that the conclusion of the Commission, like that of the Examiner, was so unreasonable that we should set it aside. The Commission found that the appellant had failed to demonstrate a need for its proposed new service2 which would outweigh the loss of service caused to station WIOS by the resulting interference. Accordingly, the Commission concluded that the proposed application for service was not in the public interest and therefore should be denied. We think the Commission’s conclusion was within the discretion available to it under the standards applicable to judicial views.

As to the refusal of the Commission to defer action on appellant’s petition for rehearing pending disposition of the WIOS application for a change of frequency, this also was within the permissible range of the Commission’s discretion. See Greenwich Broadcasting Corp. v. Federal Communications Comm., 111 U.S. App.D.C. -, 294 F. 2d 913.

Affirmed.

. Appellant, Atlas Broadcasting Company, became the licensee of station WMAX on October 24, 1960, pursuant to Commission approval of tbe assignment of the license from WMAX, Inc. . 47 C.F.R. § 3.24(b) (Supp.1961).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw