W. W. ALBERTS, APPELLANT,
v.
FORD MOTOR COMPANY; BERTHA ALBERTS, APPELLANT, V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY
W. W. ALBERTS, APPELLANT,
FORD MOTOR COMPANY; BERTHA ALBERTS, APPELLANT, V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY
292 F.2d 494
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (1961)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The jury in answer to the first interrogatory propounded under the special verdict pursuant to Rule 49(a), Fed.R.Civ.Proc., 28 U.S.C., found the respective Lincoln Continental automobiles were “fit for the ordinary purpose for which automobiles are used.” In view of this fact it makes no difference that the court did not charge with respect to express warranty. We perceive no error in the record prejudicial to the plaintiffs' causes. Consequently, the judgments will be affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
LEE v. United States, 400 F.2d 185 (9th Cir. 1968)
-
Cagle v. Harris, 349 F.2d 404 (8th Cir. 1965)
-
United States ex rel. L. B. Binion v. Ryan, 314 F.2d 389 (3d Cir. 1963)