UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE,
v.
JOSEPH SAVAGE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

2d Cir. | 1961-06-30
Nos. 413, Docket 26063
292 F.2d 264 United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (1961) Positive Treatment
Cited by 14 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Here the trial judge, sitting without a jury and acting on clear evidence that defendant had possession of heroin, used the statutory inference permitted from possession to find that the drug had been illegally imported into the United States and that the statute 21 U.S.C. § 174 had been violated. There have been too many cases sustaining this or a like inference as reasonable and rational for us now to hold it invalid. Yee Hem v. United States, 268 U.S. 178, 184, 45 S.Ct. 470, 69 L.Ed. 904; Casey v. United States, 276 U.S. 413, 418, 48 S.Ct. 373, 72 L.Ed. 632; United States v. Moe Liss, 2 Cir., 105 F. 2d 144, 146; Velasquez v. United States, 10 Cir., 244 F. 2d 416, 419; Cellino v. United States, 9 Cir., 276 F. 2d 941, 943-946; Walker v. United States, 5 Cir., 285 F. 2d 52, 58-60.

We are indebted to assigned counsel and to the New York Legal Aid Society for ably protecting the rights of the accused.

Conviction affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw