EDWARD M. STUART AND THE JOHN E. STUART COMPANY, APPELLANTS,
v.
THEODORE C. MEEKER, DOING BUSINESS AS TRI-STATE ENGINEERING & SERVICE CO., APPELLEE
EDWARD M. STUART AND THE JOHN E. STUART COMPANY, APPELLANTS,
THEODORE C. MEEKER, DOING BUSINESS AS TRI-STATE ENGINEERING & SERVICE CO., APPELLEE
289 F.2d 902
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (1961)
Caution
Cited by 10 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The parties had been partners in an air conditioning business. Stuart sold his interest to Meeker and agreed that for two years he would not “interfere” with Meeker’s business, but would work for him as a part-time employee. Meeker sued Stuart for alleged violations of the dissolution agreement and was awarded damages and other relief. Stuart appeals.
We accept the trial court’s interpretation of the dissolution agreement, and are of the opinion that the evidence supported its decision.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Am. Bible Soc'y v. Winton M. Blount, 446 F.2d 588 (3d Cir. 1971)
-
Commissioner OF Internal Revenue v. Seaboard Fin. Co., 367 F.2d 646 (9th Cir. 1966)
-
Metheany v. United States, 390 F.2d 559 (9th Cir. 1968)
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence