RUBY STRINGFIELD, FOR HERSELF, AND FOR AND IN BEHALF OF HAROLD P. LANE, EARL SUTTON, BARRY M. BURKHART, TRAVIS FULKS, JAMES HUFF, JOE HYATT, GEORGE M. BROCK, RICHARD L. JOHNSON, DONALD PELTIER, DARREL STRINGFIELD, RICHARD F. TAPIA, PAUL DYER, THORNTON GREENE, R. HODGE, JACK PRINCE, JR., CLAUDE G. BRIM, ORVILLE D. LEACH, CURTIS C. COFFEE, HARRISON H. HOLDER, FRANK SCHOEN, PHILIP H. ROULEAU, ROY M. HARRIS, M. A. SATTERFIELD, H. NEWSOME, WILLIAM L. GRIFFIN, AND ALL OTHER HOURLY RATED EMPLOYEES IN THE DETROIT PLANT OF THE UNITED STATES RUBBER COMPANY, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION TRANSACTING BUSINESS IN MICHIGAN, WHO ARE NOW ON LAY-OFF AS A CLASS, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF THE UNITED RUBBER, CORK, LINOLEUM AND PLASTIC WORKERS OF AMERICA, AND LOCAL 101, UNITED RUBBER, CORK, LINOLEUM AND PLASTIC WORKERS OF AMERICA, DEFENDANTS
RUBY STRINGFIELD, FOR HERSELF, AND FOR AND IN BEHALF OF HAROLD P. LANE, EARL SUTTON, BARRY M. BURKHART, TRAVIS FULKS, JAMES HUFF, JOE HYATT, GEORGE M. BROCK, RICHARD L. JOHNSON, DONALD PELTIER, DARREL STRINGFIELD, RICHARD F. TAPIA, PAUL DYER, THORNTON GREENE, R. HODGE, JACK PRINCE, JR., CLAUDE G. BRIM, ORVILLE D. LEACH, CURTIS C. COFFEE, HARRISON H. HOLDER, FRANK SCHOEN, PHILIP H. ROULEAU, ROY M. HARRIS, M. A. SATTERFIELD, H. NEWSOME, WILLIAM L. GRIFFIN, AND ALL OTHER HOURLY RATED EMPLOYEES IN THE DETROIT PLANT OF THE UNITED STATES RUBBER COMPANY, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION TRANSACTING BUSINESS IN MICHIGAN, WHO ARE NOW ON LAY-OFF AS A CLASS, PLAINTIFFS,
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF THE UNITED RUBBER, CORK, LINOLEUM AND PLASTIC WORKERS OF AMERICA, AND LOCAL 101, UNITED RUBBER, CORK, LINOLEUM AND PLASTIC WORKERS OF AMERICA, DEFENDANTS
285 F.2d 764
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit (1960)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
The above cause coming on to be heard upon the record and briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised:
Now, therefore, it is hereby ordered, adjudged and decreed that the order of the District Court dismissing the amended complaint be and is hereby affirmed on the opinion of Judge Levin, 190 F.Supp. 380. See also Gainey v. Brotherhood of Railway and Steamship Clerks, 3 Cir., 275 F. 2d 342; Fingar v. Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company, 5 Cir., 277 F. 2d. 698.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Henry Broch & Co., 368 U.S. 360 (U.S. 1962)
-
Swanee Paper Corp. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 291 F.2d 833 (2d Cir. 1961)
-
Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Jantzen, Inc., 356 F.2d 253 (9th Cir. 1966)
Authorities Cited
- Gainey v. Brotherhood OF Railway AND Steamship Clerks, 275 F.2d 342 (3d Cir. 1960)
- Fingar v. Seaboard AIR Line R.R. Co., 277 F.2d 698 (5th Cir. 1960)