PORTLAND BASEBALL CLUB, INC., A CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
BALTIMORE BASEBALL CLUB, INC., A CORPORATION, ET AL., APPELLEE

9th Cir. | 1960-09-13
No. 16816
282 F.2d 680 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1960) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed on the authority of Toolson v. New York Yankees, Inc., 346 U.S. 356, 74 S.Ct. 78, 98 L.Ed. 64, and Radovich v. National Football League, 352 U.S. 445, 77 S.Ct. 390, 1 L.Ed.2d 456.

Appellant tries to bring professional baseball under the antitrust laws as boxing was done by United States v. International Boxing Club, 348 U.S. 236, 75 S.Ct. 259, 99 L.Ed. 290, and football by Radovich.

It asserts and pleads that conditions of restraint in professional baseball are now more aggravated than at the times of Federal Baseball Club of Baltimore v. National League, 259 U.S. 200, 42 S.Ct. 465, 66 L.Ed. 898 and Toolson. Also, it thinks Radovich and other decisions now undercut Toolson and Federal Baseball. But as we read Toolson and Radovich the Supreme Court is still holding to the proposition that if professional baseball is to be brought within the pale of federal antitrust laws, the Congress must do it.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Flood v. Kuhn, 407 U.S. 258 (U.S. 1972)
  • Major League Baseball v. Butterworth, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22021 (N.D. Fla. 2001)
    …quires Basketball Club, 468 F.2d 1064 (2d Cir.1972); Kowalski v. Chandler, 202 F.2d 413 (6th Cir.1953); Charles O. Finley & Co. v. Kuhn, 569 F.2d 527 (7th Cir.1978); Portland Baseball Club, Inc. v. Baltimore Baseball Club, Inc., 282 F.2d 680 (9th Cir.1960); Smith v. Pro Football, Inc., 593 F.2d 1173 (D.C.Cir.1978); Morsani v. Major League Baseball, 79 F.Supp.2d 1331 (M.D.Fl.1999); McCoy v. Major League Baseball, 911 F.Supp. 454 (W.D.Wash.1995); New Orleans Pelica…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw