YOSHIRO ROY YAMAURA, APPELLANT,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE
YOSHIRO ROY YAMAURA, APPELLANT,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE
282 F.2d 564
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1960)
Cited by 2 cases
Topics
28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion For Post-Conviction Relief
Merger Of Offenses
Consecutive Sentences
28 U.S.C. § 2255
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion For Post-Conviction Relief cases and more on FLexlaw
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The order of the district court denying relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, is affirmed.
Previously, the same appellant presented the same question to the same district court and relief was denied. Under the circumstances of this case, there is no need to consider the question again. See Burns v. United States, 8 Cir., 229 F. 2d 87.
However, appellant’s contention that he has been given consecutive sentences on two counts and that the two counts constituted one offense has been answered adversely to him in Gore v. United States, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 315, 244 F. 2d 763, affirmed 357 U.S. 386, 78 S.Ct. 1280, 2 L. Ed.2d 1405.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Colon-Padilla, 770 F.2d 1328 (5th Cir. 1985)
-
RAY v. United States, 295 F.2d 416 (10th Cir. 1961)
Authorities Cited
- Gore v. United States, 357 U.S. 386 (U.S. 1958)
- McKinley E. Gore v. United States, 244 F.2d 763 (D.C. Cir. 1957)
- Burns v. United States, 229 F.2d 87 (8th Cir. 1956)