JAMES N. LEWIS, APPELLANT,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE; THEODORE SIMMS, APPELLANT, V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Appeals from judgments of conviction filed nearly a year after the right of appeal accrued must be dismissed, even if excusable neglect is found for the late filing.
Appellants were convicted of assault with intent to commit rape and sentenced in December 1957. Nearly a year later, they filed a motion to vacate sen…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Federal Rules Of Criminal Procedure cases and more on FLexlaw
BASTIAN, Circuit Judge.
Appellants, Lewis and Simms, were indicated with three other men on the charge of rape. Four defendants, including appellants herein, were convicted of the crime of assault with intent to commit rape. The fifth defendant was not brought to trial because it was determined that he was mentally incompetent. After the verdict of the jury, finding appellants guilty, and on December 20, 1957, they were sentenced.
Nearly a year later, on December 3, 1958, appellants filed motion to vacate sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and to discharge them from custody. This motion was denied by the trial judge on December 17, 1958.
Thereafter, and on December 31, 1958, appellants made application for leave to appeal from the judgment of conviction in forma pauperis, which was denied by the District Court on January 7, 1959. Thereafter they applied to this court for leave to appeal in forma pauperis and on June 23, 1959, this court remanded the case to the District Court with directions to reconsider appellants’ motion to vacate sentence “in the light of papers filed in this case * * * and to determine in a hearing whether petitioners’ failure to file a timely notice of appeal was the result of excusable neglect.” The action of this court was taken prior to the decision of the Supreme Court in United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 80 S.Ct. 282, 4 L.Ed.2d 259, which held that an appeal from a judgment of conviction must be filed within the time fixed by the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.
On June 30, 1959, the District Court granted appellants the right to appeal from the judgment of conviction as the result of excusable neglect but denied their motion to vacate sentence.1 In view of the decision of the Supreme Court in Robinson, supra, the appeals from the judgments of conviction, having been filed nearly a year after right of appeal accrued, must be dismissed.
Appeals dismissed.
. The formal order denying the motion to vacate sentence was entered March 2, 1960, and an appeal therefrom is now pending.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (U.S. 1962)
-
Lewis v. United States, 294 F.2d 209 (D.C. Cir. 1961)
Authorities Cited
- United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220 (U.S. 1960)