UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE,
v.
VINCENT DI DONNA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE,
VINCENT DI DONNA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
276 F.2d 956
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (1960)
Cited by 10 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The trial judge properly refused to give the jury any instruction on the subject of entrapment. There was no evidence in the record to support such a defense as the defendant himself testified that he did not know what was in the package which he admittedly delivered to the narcotics agent. United States v. Pagano, 2 Cir., 1953, 207 F. 2d 884, 885. The other allegations of error are entirely without merit.
The judgment is affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Pierce v. United States, 414 F.2d 163 (5th Cir. 1969)
-
United States v. Valencia, 645 F.2d 1158 (2d Cir. 1980)
-
Johnson v. United States, 317 F.2d 127 (D.C. Cir. 1963)
Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- United States v. Pagano, 207 F.2d 884 (2d Cir. 1953)