FRANCIS FLANAGAN AND HARRIET D. FLANAGAN, PETITIONERS,
v.
E. COOPER SHAMBLEN AND ELAINE M. SHAMBLEN, RESPONDENTS
FRANCIS FLANAGAN AND HARRIET D. FLANAGAN, PETITIONERS,
E. COOPER SHAMBLEN AND ELAINE M. SHAMBLEN, RESPONDENTS
429 So. 2d 810
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1983)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This petition for writ of common law certiorari is denied without prejudice to petitioners’ rights to obtain review of the interlocutory order in question by plenary appeal following final disposition in the trial court. Freedman v. Amdur, 160 So. 2d 131 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964).
BERANEK, GLICKSTEIN and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Bostic, 446 So. 2d 264 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)…could properly charge separate counts of theft and dealing in stolen property in connection with one scheme or course of conduct in a single information, so long as the trier of fact returns a guilty verdict on one or the other. McWhirter v. State, 429 So. 2d 810 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Daniels v. State, 422 So. 2d 1024 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Hudson v. State, 408 So. 2d 224 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); § 812.025, Fla. Stat. (1981). We conclude that the present information neither misled nor embarrassed appellee in the pre…
Authorities Cited
- Freedman v. Amdur, 160 So. 2d 131 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964)