NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, PETITIONER,
v.
STEEL, METALS, ALLOYS AND HARDWARE FABRICATORS AND WAREHOUSEMEN, LOCAL 810, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN AND HELPERS OF AMERICA, RESPONDENT

2d Cir. | 1960-01-29
Nos. 167, Docket 25808
274 F.2d 688 United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (1960) Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

On this petition, the sole issue is one of fact depending upon the credibility of conflicting testimony. The Trial Examiner accepted the testimony of Vignari, the office boy of the complaining company. He rejected the testimony of Robinson, the respondent’s field organizer. The resolution of credibility was for the Trial Examiner who saw the witnesses under cross-examination. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 340 U.S. 474, 71 S.Ct. 456, 95 L.Ed. 456. The testimony relied upon was not “hopelessly incredible,” nor in flat contradiction of “a so-called ‘law of nature’ or undisputed documentary testimony.” National Labor Relations Board v. Dinion Coil Co., 2 Cir., 201 F. 2d 484, 490; National Labor Relations Board v. James Thompson & Co., 2 Cir., 208 F. 2d 743.

Enforcement granted.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw