AARON OSTROFSKY, JOSEPH HENDERSON, WILLIAM H. WOOD AND BENJAMIN M. FINO, APPELLANTS,
v.
UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA, A.F.L.-C.I.O., AND UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL UNIONS NOS. 2609 AND 2610, AND BETHLEHEM STEEL COMPANY, APPELLEES
AARON OSTROFSKY, JOSEPH HENDERSON, WILLIAM H. WOOD AND BENJAMIN M. FINO, APPELLANTS,
UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA, A.F.L.-C.I.O., AND UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL UNIONS NOS. 2609 AND 2610, AND BETHLEHEM STEEL COMPANY, APPELLEES
273 F.2d 614
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (1960)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 22 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
For the reason that the plaintiffs utterly failed to cooperate with the union, as clearly shown in the opinion of the District Court, 171 F.Supp. 782, we think the union was neither unreasonable nor arbitrary in refusing to prosecute the grievances of the plaintiffs. Consequently, no right of action has accrued to them against the union or against their former employer. Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (11 total)
-
Vaca v. Sipes, 386 U.S. 171 (U.S. 1967)
-
Local Union NO. 12 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 368 F.2d 12 (5th Cir. 1966)
-
The Procter & Gamble Indep. Union OF Port Ivory v. The Procter & Gamble Mfg. Co., 312 F.2d 181 (2d Cir. 1962)
Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence