SAMUEL LEE MARION, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1983-03-09
No. 82-1035
BOARDMAN and DANAHY, JJ., concur.
429 So. 2d 40 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1983) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases


Opinion of the Court
OTT, Chief Judge.

OTT, Chief Judge.

Appellant, charged with attempted first degree murder, was tried and convicted of aggravated battery. He contends the trial judge erred: (1) in not instructing the jury on aggravated assault as a lesser-included offense, and (2) in denying his motion for new trial.

The Schedule of Lesser-included Offenses in Florida Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases lists aggravated assault as a category 2 lesser-included offense of first degree murder. However, our examination of the language of the charging document and the testimony before the trial judge establishes that neither the allegata nor the probata alleged or evidenced that the victims were in fear of imminent violence. This being a necessary element to charge or establish aggravated assault, we hold there was no error in failing to instruct the jury thereon. Dunn v. State, 397 So. 2d 748 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981), petition for review denied, 407 So. 2d 1103 (Fla.1981).

Finding no merit in the remaining contention, appellant’s judgment of conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

BOARDMAN and DANAHY, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Metro. Dade Cnty. v. Reydel "Sonny" Santos, 430 So. 2d 506 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
    …an Dade County, 425 F. 2d 1141 (5th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 805, 91 S.Ct. 12, 27 L.Ed.2d 35 (1970); see generally, Florida Lime and Avocado Growers, Inc. v. Paul, 373 U.S. 132, 83 S.Ct. 1210, 10 L.Ed.2d 248 (1963); City of Miramar v. Bain, 429 So. 2d 40 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); compare Scavella v. Fernandez, 371 So. 2d 535 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979) (code 60 day notice provision in conflict with statutory provision granting 2 years for same notice). The propriety of the conclusion that Sec. 104.31(1) does not…
  • …on. The fact that Monroe County restrictions apply to the development, or that county permits have been issued and referenced in these proceedings, does not show an impermissible delegation of GFC authority in this case. Cf. City of Miramar v. Bain, 429 So. 2d 40 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). The third issue here is whether the GFC violated applicable law, such as the takings clause in the Florida and United States Constitutions, in adopting the hearing officer’s recommended order that the permittees, or their succe…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw