RANDOLPH G. LYON, LIBELANT-APPELLANT,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE-APPELLANT, AND PROJECT CONSTRUCTION CORP., RESPONDENT-IMPLEADED-APPELLEE

2d Cir. | 1959-04-02
Nos. 198, Docket 25334
265 F.2d 219 United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (1959) Caution
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The District Court rightly held that the libelant, an employee of the impleaded contractor, was entitled to no warranty of seaworthiness. He was engaged in a type of work not “traditionally done by seamen.” United New York and New Jersey Sandy Hook Pilots Ass’n v. Halecki, 79 S.Ct. 517, 519.

To the negligence count maritime, rather than state law, applied. Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale Transatlantique, 79 S.Ct. 406. The District Court found that the United States had no power of supervision or control over the work and was under no duty to provide temporary protection for the libel-ant. This finding is not assailed, and in any event is not clearly erroneous. McAllister v. United States, 348 U.S. 19, 75 S.Ct. 6, 99 L.Ed. 20; Alison v. United States, 2 Cir., 251 F. 2d 74. In the absence of power to supervise or control the work, the shipowner cannot be held negligent. Filipek v. Moore-McCormack Lines, 2 Cir., 258 F. 2d 734, certiorari denied 79 S.Ct. 605.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw