UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
MICHAEL NIGRO, APPELLANT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
MICHAEL NIGRO, APPELLANT
253 F.2d 587
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (1958)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 10 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The issue presented is whether the court below abused its discretion in denying the defendant-appellant’s, Ni-gro’s, motion for a new trial based on alleged newly-discovered evidence. There was no manifest abuse of discretion by the trial judge in denying the motion. It is well settled that a new trial will not be granted unless it be apparent that the new evidence would probably produce a different verdict after a new trial. The evidence offered by Nigro does not meet this test.
Accordingly the order of the court below denying the motion for a new trial will be affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Channel v. United States, 285 F.2d 217 (9th Cir. 1960)
-
United States v. Meyers, 484 F.2d 113 (3d Cir. 1973)
-
United States v. Iannelli, 528 F.2d 1290 (3d Cir. 1976)
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence