PHILLIP DANIELS, APPELLANT,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE

9th Cir. | 1957-05-28
No. 15410
Before MATHEWS, CHAMBERS and BARNES, Circuit Judges.
246 F.2d 194 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1957) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that a motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 is not the proper vehicle to seek a reduction of a lawfully imposed sentence.


Facts & Procedural History

Phillip Daniels pleaded guilty to first-degree murder and was sentenced to life imprisonment. He later filed a motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 seeking…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.

. Formerly called the District Court for the District of Alaska. See the Act of June 6, 1900, c. 786, 31 Stat. 321, and 48 U.S.C.A. § 101. But see also 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 373, 460, 610, 753(a), 1291, 1292(1), 1294(2), 1346(b), 2072 and 2410 (a); 29 U.S.C.A. § 217; and 48 U.S.C.A. § 103a.

. The District Court was established by the Act of June 6, 1900, c. 786, 31 Stat. 321.

. Obviously, a 10-year sentence, imposed on or as of December 3, 1952, would still have several years to run.

. In Alaska, the only penalties for first degree murder are those prescribed in §§ 65-4-1 and 65-4-2 of Alaska Compiled Laws Annotated, 1949. Section 65-4-1 provides: “That whoever, being of sound memory and discretion, purposely, and either of deliberate and premeditated malice or by means of poison, or in perpetrating or in attempting to perpetrate, any rape, arson, robbery, or burglary, kills another, is guilty of murder in the first degree, and shall suffer death.” Section 65-4-2 provides: “That in all cases where the accused is found guilty of the crime of murder under this and the next preceding section, the jury may qualify their verdict by adding thereto ‘without capital punishment;’ and whenever the jury shall return a verdict qualified as aforesaid the person convicted shall be sentenced to imprisonment at hard labor for life.” Appellant, having pleaded guilty, did not have a jury trial. Consequently, there was no verdict in his case—qualified or otherwise. Nevertheless, as indicated above, the District Court, instead of sentencing appellant to death, sentenced him to life imprisonment. Whether the District Court erred in not sentencing appellant to death we need not and do not now decide.

. Garcia v. United States, 9 Cir., 197 F. 2d 687. See also Birtch v. United States, 4 Cir., 173 F. 2d 316; United States v. Fleenor, 7 Cir., 177 F. 2d 482; Morales v. United States, 1 Cir., 187 F. 2d 518; Godwin v. United States, 8 Cir., 191 F. 2d 932; Klein v. United States, 7 Cir., 204 F. 2d 513; Meredith v. United States, 4 Cir., 208 F. 2d 680; Hornbrook v. United States, 5 Cir., 216 F. 2d 112; United States v. Lawrence, 7 Cir., 216 F. 2d 570; Marshall v. United States, 6 Cir., 217 F. 2d 467; Adams v. United States, 95 U.S.App.D.C. 354, 222 F. 2d 45; Schumpert v. United States, 6 Cir., 226 F. 2d 578; Barber v. United States, 10 Cir., 227 F. 2d 431; Simmons v. United States, 10 Cir., 230 F. 2d 73; Johnson v. United States, 4 Cir., 234 F. 2d 813.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Authorities Cited (15 total)

View all 15 cited authorities →

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw