PAUL A. SCHUMPERT, APPELLANT,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE

6th Cir. | 1957-06-11
No. 13081
Before ALLEN, McALLISTER and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
245 F.2d 233 United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit (1957)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that each separate mailing for the proscribed purpose constituted a separate offense under the former statute.


Facts & Procedural History

Appellant pleaded guilty to seven counts of using the mails to defraud, receiving a sentence of twenty consecutive years. He filed a motion to vacate …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Topics

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Mail Fraud cases and more on FLexlaw


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was sentenced by the district court to prison terms totalling twenty consecutive years upon his plea of guilty to seven counts of a fifteen count indictment charging that he used the mails to defraud. This appeal is from the district court’s denial of his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate or correct his sentence.

It is the appellant’s contention, ably presented by court appointed counsel, that although each of the counts covered a separate use of the mails, his fraudulent scheme was a single one, and that he was therefore guilty of but one offense punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of five years. Each of the letters in question was different. They were not mailed simultaneously, but at different dates and to different addressees. Compare Bell v. United States, 1955, 349 U.S. 81, 75 S.Ct. 620, 99 L.Ed. 905; Rayborn v. United States, 6 Cir., 1956, 234 F. 2d 368.

The appellant was sentenced under former section 338 of Title 18 U.S.C., the mailings having been made before that section was amended and incorporated in 18 U.S.C.A. § 1341. It is clear that under the language of the former section each separate mailing for the proscribed purpose constituted a separate offense. Badders v. United States, 1916, 240 U.S. 391, 394, 36 S.Ct. 367, 60 L.Ed. 706; Stumbo v. United States, 6 Cir., 1937, 90 F. 2d 828, 831; Mitchell v. United States, 10 Cir., 1944, 142 F. 2d 480. Whether the language of the present statute is to be similarly construed is a question we do not reach. But see Palmer v. United States, 10 Cir., 1955, 229 F. 2d 861, certiorari denied, 1956, 350 U.S. 996, 76 S.Ct. 546, 100 L.Ed. 861.

The order of the district court is affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw