UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, APPELLANT,
v.
KAREN B. HARRIS, APPELLEE
UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, APPELLANT,
KAREN B. HARRIS, APPELLEE
426 So. 2d 1251
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1983)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 9 cases
Opinion of the Court
MILLS, Judge.
Pursuant to our opinion in Harris v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co., 409 So. 2d 1210 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), the trial court on remand rendered summary judgment in favor of Harris, the owner of a boat policy issued by United States Fidelity and Guaranty. For the reasons stated in our prior opinion, we affirm the trial court’s action.
ERVIN and WENTWORTH, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Mark and Barbara Okun v. Litwin Sec., Inc., 652 So. 2d 387 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)…DCA 1988), and once an arbitration award is confirmed by the court it becomes, like a verdict, the judgment of that court and interest on that judgment runs from date of its entry until satisfaction of same. See Haskell v. Forest Land & Timber Co., 426 So. 2d 1251 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); see also Complete Interiors, Inc. v. Behan, 558 So. 2d 48 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 570 So. 2d 1303 (Fla.1990). The trial court may not award interest which predates an arbitration award. Pharmacy Management Service v. Persch…
-
WPB, Ltd. v. Supran, 720 So. 2d 1091 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)…n a breach of contract action. The court reasoned that the “18% per annum on all past due accounts” which was specified in the plaintiffs invoices had not been agreed to in writing by the builder. Similarly, in Haskell v. Forest Land and Timber Co., 426 So. 2d 1251 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983), the first district did not apply section 687.01 to award interest on an arbitration award, because the parties’ arbitration agreement failed to provide for interest. The necessary implication of Has-kell is that the statute woul…
-
Heartland Express v. Farber, 260 So. 3d 1148 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018)…oper starting point of the administrative calculation of post-judgment interest. In Haskell v. Forest Land & Timber Co., Inc., this Court recognized the general rule that interest on a judgment runs from the date that the judgment is entered. 426 So. 2d 1251, 1253 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). This Court also reiterated that “[t]he general rule regarding the commencement of interest does not apply where a trial court judgment is overturned by an appellate court on grounds that it was improper or excessive.”…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Harris v. United States Fid. & Guar. Co., 409 So. 2d 1210 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)