BUNT BISHOP, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
BUNT BISHOP, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
STATE OF FLORIDA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
103 Fla. 600
Florida Supreme Court (1931)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 137 So. 524
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court' that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Buford, C.J., and Whitfield and Davis, J.J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bunnie Straub v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 182 So. 3d 878 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016)…e when ownership of the property is transferred upon filing of the certificate of title. Issuance of the certificate of title confirms the sale, curing' “all irregularities, misconduct" and unfairness in the making of the sale.” McClanahan v. Mayne, 103 Fla. 600, 138 So. 36, 38 (1931); see also § 45.031(6), Fla. Stat. (2014). A subordinate lienholder’s claim to surplus from the sale is timely under section 45.032(2) when it is filed no later than sixty days after the clerk issues and files the certificate o…
-
Confederate Point P'ship, Ltd. v. Schatten, 278 So. 2d 661 (Fla. 1st DCA 1973)…le, the sale stood confirmed. Florida Statutes, § 45.031(4), F.S.A. Confirmation of a judicial sale has the effect of a final conclusive judgment and cures all irregularities, misconduct and unfairness in the making of the sale. McClanahan v. Mayne, 103 Fla. 600, 138 So. 36 (1931). Purchasers of property at a judicial sale, and all persons claiming under them, are regarded as privies to the judgment authorizing the sale and are concluded by said judgment. 50 C.J.S. Judgments § 810. In conclusion, appellant…
-
Turk v. Barns, 264 So. 2d 875 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972)…g or other action by which the appellant complained of the proceedings employed by the chancellor to finally effect a sale. Therefore, appellant waived his rights and cannot be heard to complain for the first time on appeal. Cf. McClanahan v. Mayne, 103 Fla. 600, 138 So. 36 (1931). We have considered the record, briefs and arguments of counsel in the light of the controlling principles of law. We have concluded that the appellant has failed to demonstrate that the chancellor abused his discretion or commit…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence