KAHIWA HEE CHUNG, ALSO KNOWN AS KEOHOHIWA, APPELLANT,
v.
AH SEE HEE, EXECUTOR UNDER THE WILL OF EMALIA HAAHAA AKIONA HEE, ALSO KNOWN AS E. HAAHAA, APPELLEE

9th Cir. | 1954-10-29
No. 13485
216 F.2d 614 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1954)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This was a suit for the cancellation of a deed on grounds of undue influence and mistake. The complainant in the ease was an aged and infirm Hawaiian woman, and the defendant her daughter. The relief asked was granted by the trial court on ground of mistake, and the Territorial Supreme Court affirmed, holding that there was undue influence as well. 39 Hawaii 364.

We discover in this case no manifest error either in the findings or in the application of governing principles, and the judgment must be affirmed. Cf. Waialua Agricultural Co. v. Christian, 305 U.S. 91, 59 S.Ct. 21, 83 L.Ed. 60; Meyer v. Territory of Hawaii, 9 Cir., 164 F. 2d 845; Meyer v. Territory of Hawaii, 9 Cir., 1954, 216 F. 2d 277.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw