C. MAXWELL BROWN, APPELLANT,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
This case came on to be heard upon .the record and briefs and oral argument of counsel;
And it appearing that the instructions given to the jury by the District Court taken as a whole are clear and correct under the applicable law, Lurding v. United States, 6 Cir., 179 F. 2d 419; Battjes v. United States, 6 Cir., 172 F. 2d 1;
And it appearing that the District Court in denying the motion for new trial did not abuse its discretion, Quer-cia v. United States, 1 Cir., 70 F. 2d 997, 999. Cf. Nicely v. United States, 6 Cir., 129 F. 2d 357, 358; 12 Cyclopedia of Federal Procedure, 230-232;
And it appearing that the verdict of the jury is supported by substantial and competent evidence and no reversible error appearing in the record;
It is ordered that the judgment be and it hereby is affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Battjes v. United States, 172 F.2d 1 (6th Cir. 1949)
- Lurding v. United States, 179 F.2d 419 (6th Cir. 1950)
- Quercia v. United States, 70 F.2d 997 (1st Cir. 1934)
- Nicely v. United States, 129 F.2d 357 (6th Cir. 1942)