EDGAR HIDALGO, APPELLANT,
v.
FIDELITY & CASUALTY COMPANY OF NEW YORK, APPELLEE
EDGAR HIDALGO, APPELLANT,
FIDELITY & CASUALTY COMPANY OF NEW YORK, APPELLEE
205 F.2d 834
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1953)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
HOLMES, Circuit Judge.
In this case the injury occurred in Alabama, which is the only difference between it and the case of Weingartner v. Fidelity Mutual Insurance Company, 5 Cir., 205 F. 2d 833. Therefore, upon the authority of the latter case and the Louisiana statute therein cited, the judgment appealed from, 104 F.Supp. 230, is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cagnina v. United States, 223 F.2d 149 (5th Cir. 1955)
-
Guess v. Read, 290 F.2d 622 (5th Cir. 1961)
-
Mrs. Opal Daugherty Hancock v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 267 F.2d 2 (5th Cir. 1959)
Authorities Cited
- Weingartner v. Fid. Mut. Ins. Co. of Indianapolis, 205 F.2d 833 (5th Cir. 1953)