MARION V. EVERETT, APPELLANT,
v.
HAROLD FRANCIS EVERETT, APPELLEE
MARION V. EVERETT, APPELLANT,
HAROLD FRANCIS EVERETT, APPELLEE
422 So. 2d 20
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1982)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The wife makes a wide-ranging argument that she was financially shortchanged in the dissolution judgment. From our review of the record, we cannot say that the court abused its discretion. In order to obviate the possibility of a later dispute, we hereby construe the provision which gives the wife sole possession of the marital home for a year but requires her to be solely responsible for the mortgage and insurance to mean that she will be entitled to credit for one half of these payments upon the sale of the home now owned as tenants in common by reason of the dissolution. Rubino v. Rubino, 372 So. 2d 539 (Fla. 1st DGA 1979). As construed, the judgment is affirmed.
OTT, C.J., and GRIMES and SCHOON-OVER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Peri v. State, 426 So. 2d 1021 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)…also Frank v. Mangum, 237 U.S. 309, 338, 35 S.Ct. 582, 591, 59 L.Ed. 969, 984 (1915); Diaz v. United States, 223 U.S. 442, 455, 32 S.Ct. 250, 253, 56 L.Ed. 500, 505 (1912); Hopt v. Utah, 110 U.S. 574, 4 S.Ct. 202, 28 L.Ed. 262 (1884); Shaw v. State, 422 So. 2d 20 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982) (for purposes of an accused’s constitutional right to be present at all stages of a trial, the trial runs from the commencement of the selection of the jury through the discharge of the jury). As noted supra, Article 1, Section 16…
-
Young v. Young, 507 So. 2d 614 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987)…n. CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and SANDERLIN, J.,, concur. ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION FRANK, Judge. The ex-wife in the above-styled proceeding has sought clarification of our opinion. We grant the motion. Reference to our decision in Everett v. Everett, 422 So. 2d 20 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982), was inadvertently omitted. Everett is applicable to the instant matter. Thus, the ex-wife, who was awarded sole possession of the marital home and is responsible for mortgage and insurance payments, is entitled as a tenant in com…
Authorities Cited
- Rubino v. Rubino, 372 So. 2d 539 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979)