JASPER PORTER, APPELLANT,
v.
J. FAIRFAX CONRAD, APPELLEE
JASPER PORTER, APPELLANT,
J. FAIRFAX CONRAD, APPELLEE
196 F.2d 240
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (1952)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This appeal was allowed to review the application by the Municipal Court of Appeals of our decisions in Rosenberg v. Murray,1 and Hiscox v. Jackson2 in determining the limited circumstances under which t-he presumption of consent under the District of Columbia Owners’ Financial Responsibility Act, D.C.Code § 40-403 (1940), may be overcome as a matter of law. Upon our review of this case, we conclude that the Municipal Court of Appeals correctly stated and applied the governing principles laid down by this court.
We therefore adopt the opinion of the Municipal Court of Appeals, reported in 1951, 79 A. 2d 777, in affirming its judgment herein.
Affirmed.
. 1940, 73 App.D.C. 67, 116 F. 2d 552.
. 1942, 75 U.S.App.D.C. 293, 127 F. 2d 160.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Emory M. Jones, Sr. v. Halun, 296 F.2d 597 (D.C. Cir. 1961)
Authorities Cited
- Rosenberg v. Murray, 116 F.2d 552 (D.C. Cir. 1940)
- Hiscox v. Jackson, 127 F.2d 160 (D.C. Cir. 1942)