GEORGE B. WEIRES AND EVORA RUSSO, A/K/A EVORA MARRERO, APPELLANTS,

v.

EDMUND P. RUSSO, TRUSTEE, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Backus v. State, 864 So. 2d 1158 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)
  …a). For the exception to apply, “[tjhere must at least be some artic-ulable facts from which it is reasonable to infer that there was a recent border crossing.” United States v. Garcia, 598 F.Supp. 533, 535-536 (S.D.Fla.1984); see also Chi v. State, 421 So. 2d 670, 670 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). In the case at bar, the evidence supports the trial court’s factual finding that Backus navigated his boat more than three but less than twelve nautical miles from shore. Whether this finding establishes that Backus crossed…
• Livingston K. Saunders v. State, 758 So. 2d 724 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)
  …l activity. In support of his position, appellant relies on United States v. Gollwitzer, 697 F. 2d 1357 (11th Cir.1983), Blair v. United States, 665 F. 2d 500 (4th Cir.1981), United States v. Williams, 544 F. 2d 807 (5th Cir.1977), and Chi v. State, 421 So. 2d 670 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). The fallacy of appellant’s argument is that all of the cases he relies upon interpreted the rights of customs officers (and Coast Guard officers acting as agents of the U.S. Customs Service) in enforcing the customs laws of the…

Authorities Cited

• Horton v. O'Rourke, 321 So. 2d 612 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975)
• R. M. Vogel and R. v. Gisselbeck, 373 So. 2d 366 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979)