BEECHER
v.
LEAVENWORTH STATE BANK ET AL.
PER CURIAM.
Beecher alleges that he has filed in the district court certain notices of appeal which he describes as follows: Notice of Appeal June 5, 1951; Notice of Appeal June 13, 1951; Notice of Appeal June 30, 1951; Notice of Appeal August 4, 1951.
He seeks our order to permit him to appeal forma pauperis. His affidavit fails to describe the error he claims in any one of the orders appealed from. That is to say, he does not state the nature of the appeal, the merits of which we are required to consider before granting him the right to appeal in forma pauperis. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a); Huffman v. Smith, 9 Cir., 172 F. 2d 129; cf. Fisher v. Cushman, 9 Cir., 99 F. 2d 918.
The permission to appeal forma pauperis in these' appeals is dénied. • This order is without prejudice to the filing of a proper affidavit. Appellant’s time to docket the records in any above appeals hereafter taken in forma pauperis is extended to October 15, 1951.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Beecher v. Leavenworth State Bank, 209 F.2d 20 (9th Cir. 1953)
-
Matter of the Application of Clayton C. Pierce, 246 F.2d 902 (9th Cir. 1957)
-
Beecher v. Smithson, 217 F.2d 304 (9th Cir. 1954)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Huffman v. Smith, 172 F.2d 129 (9th Cir. 1949)
- Fisher v. Cushman, 99 F.2d 918 (9th Cir. 1938)